AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 19, 2009 07:20PM
Hi Srikanth,

Note that 3dDeconvolve has the GAM basis function, so waver
does not need to factor into your thinking.

Your question is on the difference between GAM and BLOCK(1,1).
GAM is a more compact curve, lasting for about 12 seconds,
while BLOCK is wider, lasting 15.

To compare the curves, use 3dDeconvolve with a stimulus at
time 0 for each type, and then plot the resulting X-matrix:

------------------------------------
3dDeconvolve -nodata 20 1 -polort -1 -num_stimts 2 \
-stim_times 1 '1D: 0' GAM \
-stim_times 2 '1D: 0' 'BLOCK(1,1)' \
-x1D X.xmat.1D -x1D_stop

1dplot X.xmat.1D
------------------------------------

For a 1 second stimulus, I would be inclined to use GAM.
Beyond that, probably BLOCK. Either is probably reasonable
in your case, and the results should not be very different.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth February 23, 2009 05:48PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds February 23, 2009 06:08PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth February 23, 2009 06:20PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds February 23, 2009 07:13PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth September 19, 2009 04:48PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds September 19, 2009 07:20PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth September 20, 2009 03:52PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

bob cox September 21, 2009 08:11AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth September 21, 2009 09:47AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth December 17, 2009 06:37PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds December 18, 2009 09:59AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth December 18, 2009 10:45AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Marc Ettlinger October 21, 2009 03:06PM