History of AFNI updates  

|
February 19, 2010 11:42AM
Hi Anita,

You certainly do not want to blur after converting to percent signal
change, the blur should come first (unless, you are blurring in only
gray matter, for example).

Note that we do not recommend masking your data either, until group
analysis. Please see the 'MASKING NOTE' section of "afni_proc.py -help"
for details.

It might be worth reviewing how afni_proc.py writes the processing
script, and comparing it to yours.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 18, 2010 08:38PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 11:42AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 01:20PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 04:19PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 06:44PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 20, 2010 02:19AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 09:56AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 22, 2010 10:52AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 01:34PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori March 29, 2010 06:43AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds March 31, 2010 09:39AM