History of AFNI updates  

|
February 19, 2010 06:44PM
Hi Anita,

We suggest not masking at all until after single subject analysis.
It helps you notice artifacts and it helps to avoid computing group
results where only some of the subjects have data.

Whether individual subject analysis is done in native space does
not matter that way (we suggest doing it in standard space). You
can review my 'WARP TO TLRC NOTE' note from "afni_proc.py -help"
for comments on that subject. :)

Getting higher % change values at the edge of the brain is normal
because of partial volume effects and motion. But I would rather
see what is happening there (and try to understand it :) than mask
it out and not even know. Voxels that have this effect should not
end up as significant with respect to regressors of interest though
(which is part of why motion parameters are included in regression).

- rick

Subject Author Posted

percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 18, 2010 08:38PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 11:42AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 01:20PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 04:19PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 06:44PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 20, 2010 02:19AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 09:56AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 22, 2010 10:52AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 01:34PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori March 29, 2010 06:43AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds March 31, 2010 09:39AM