History of AFNI updates  

|
February 22, 2010 01:34PM
Hi Oori,

Yes, working on the surface allows one to blur and cluster
in a more topologically correct manner. Those are some of
the main advantages of doing analysis on the surface.

The 3dBlurInMask program does a good job of not crossing
mask boundaries when blurring. That is an afni_proc.py
option, too.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 18, 2010 08:38PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 11:42AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 01:20PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 04:19PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 06:44PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 20, 2010 02:19AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 09:56AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 22, 2010 10:52AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 01:34PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori March 29, 2010 06:43AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds March 31, 2010 09:39AM