AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 02, 2012 01:13AM
Hi Dr. Chen, thank you for your reply.

yeah, there are 23 trials in each condition, and you wrote that "Whether you should use AM1 or AM2 depends on the type of questions you'd like to ask regarding your data. ", does it mean that:

If the item-wise regressors is actually the main effect which is of interest, should I use AM1 instead of AM2? Say three critical conditions are differ in semantic distance, and I used GLT to test the difference between conditions in the past. And now I'd like to find the areas that activation is modulated by semantic distance, should AM1 be used? Should I just need to put the three conditions in ONE "stim_times_AM1"? Does the activaiton map we get refelct the correlation between brain activation and semantic distance? Can we contrast the activation maps which are both resulted from AM1?

When the three conditions differ in semantic distance but semantic distance is not what we are interested in, is it better for us to use AM2 so that we can discriminate the areas which is sensitive and insensitive to semantic distance? In this case, should I define each condition in a separate "stim_times_AM2"?
Subject Author Posted

item-level covriate

JY June 08, 2012 11:47AM

Re: item-level covriate

gang June 08, 2012 04:18PM

Re: item-level covriate

JY June 11, 2012 05:54PM

Re: item-level covriate

gang June 11, 2012 06:06PM

Re: item-level covriate

JY June 13, 2012 06:09PM

Re: item-level covriate

JY June 13, 2012 10:58PM

Re: item-level covriate

JY June 14, 2012 10:19PM

Re: item-level covriate

gang July 01, 2012 09:40PM

Re: item-level covriate

JY August 31, 2012 06:18PM

Re: item-level covriate

gang September 03, 2012 09:50AM

Re: item-level covriate

Panda July 01, 2012 12:19PM

Re: item-level covriate

gang July 01, 2012 10:07PM

Re: item-level covriate

Panda July 02, 2012 01:13AM

Re: item-level covriate

gang July 09, 2012 07:50PM

Re: item-level covriate

Panda August 29, 2012 10:58PM

Re: item-level covriate

gang August 31, 2012 09:36AM