History of AFNI updates  

|
July 19, 2012 01:30PM
Okay, thank you for that suggestion. This brings me back to one of my other questions re: alpha sim.

I ran 3dFWHMx using TT_mask_lowres+tlrc for each subject. Then averaged the smoothing estimates and ran 3dClustSim with these averages and, again, using the TT_mask_lowres+trlc. This yielded absurdly low cluster threshold for the various FDR levels, so this definitely seems like an inappropriate choice.
Do you have a suggestion for what masks I should use that would be appropriate for figuring out the cluster thresholds?

Thanks!!
Mel

(for each subject:)
3dFWHMx -dset errts.${SUBNUM}+tlrc -mask TT_mask_lowres+tlrc

(with the average values from all subjects:)
3dClustSim -nxyz 64 64 33 -dxyz 3.0 3.0 3.0 -fwhmxyz 10.59842511.0950909110.15940136 -mask TT_mask_lowres+tlrc
Subject Author Posted

mask at group level

lianablair July 11, 2012 03:38PM

Re: mask at group level

Isaac Schwabacher July 11, 2012 04:20PM

Re: mask at group level

rick reynolds July 11, 2012 04:31PM

Re: mask at group level

lianablair July 19, 2012 10:47AM

Re: mask at group level

Peter Molfese July 19, 2012 12:23PM

Re: mask at group level

lianablair July 19, 2012 01:30PM

Re: mask at group level

rick reynolds July 19, 2012 09:09PM

Re: mask at group level

Anonymous User July 20, 2012 10:21AM

Re: mask at group level

gang July 20, 2012 11:38AM