AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 14, 2005 04:32PM
Hi Phil,

Having a "normalized" peak of around 600 is not strange at all,
even with only small movement. Voxels just outside the brain
can have values bouncing around 20. Even a small movement
can temporarily bounce this into the hundreds, while the average
sits at 20. A temporary bounce to 220 is a 1000% signal change.
And any ghosting can produce very large values that are not even
close to the brain.

In HowTo #5, 3dAutomask was used to mask out the non-brain
voxels. The maximum (remaining) normalized peak was around
200 (100% change) for most of the 10 runs. Without 3dAutomask,
the peak was generally around 13000 (because of averages that
were basically at zero), and just knocking off voxels with averages
less than 50 drops the maximum normalized value to under 500.

At any rate, some sort of Automask procedure seems reasonable.
See the script for HowTo #5 for example:

[afni.nimh.nih.gov]

In text: [afni.nimh.nih.gov]

- rick
Subject Author Posted

normalization and inferior slices

Phil Burton February 11, 2005 04:40PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

Robert Cox February 14, 2005 11:19AM

Two more questions

Phil Burton February 14, 2005 01:01PM

Re: Two more questions

Robert Cox February 14, 2005 03:03PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

rick reynolds February 14, 2005 04:32PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

Phil Burton February 14, 2005 06:40PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

rick reynolds February 15, 2005 10:56AM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

Phil Burton February 15, 2005 11:54AM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

rick reynolds February 15, 2005 12:04PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

Phil Burton February 15, 2005 12:14PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

rick reynolds February 15, 2005 01:39PM

Re: normalization and inferior slices

Phil Burton February 15, 2005 05:03PM