AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 07, 2005 11:07AM
To expand what Gang said a little:

When you have a single group of subjects, then using 3dANOVA to compare results among a set of tasks is a generalization of a two-sample t-test (generalizing from two tasks to multiple tasks). This is the appropriate thing to use when the subjects in different tasks are different people.

Using 3dANOVA2 mixed effects is a generalization of a paired t-test. This is the appropriate thing to do when the subjects in different task are all the same people.

When you have different groups of subjects that you also wish to compare (e.g., men and women, patients and controls), then you get up to 3dANOVA3, which would allow for a layout like (tasks)X(subject type)X(subject) -- this is the 'nested' design.
Subject Author Posted

3dANOVA2 vs fixed effects ANOVA

Mariko March 04, 2005 06:14PM

Re: 3dANOVA2 vs fixed effects ANOVA

Gang Chen March 07, 2005 09:44AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 vs fixed effects ANOVA

Robert Cox March 07, 2005 11:07AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 vs fixed effects ANOVA

Mariko March 07, 2005 01:45PM

Re: 3dANOVA2 vs fixed effects ANOVA

Gang Chen March 07, 2005 02:04PM

Re: 3dANOVA2 vs fixed effects ANOVA

Mariko March 07, 2005 02:35PM