AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 20, 2006 11:27AM
Hi Gang--

Thanks again for the response. This was extremely helpful. In my case I have two runs of data, and so the analysis on percent signal change is more appropriate (also, I just read your page on scaling and percent signal change: [afni.nimh.nih.gov] and effects of multiple runs).

It looks like in cases where percent signal change can be calculated, this is the preferred DV.

Anthony
Subject Author Posted

z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Anthony Dick June 16, 2006 04:15PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Gang Chen June 16, 2006 05:39PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Anthony Dick June 16, 2006 06:00PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Gang Chen June 19, 2006 10:56AM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Anthony Dick June 19, 2006 12:20PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Gang Chen June 19, 2006 02:59PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Anthony Dick June 19, 2006 05:05PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Gang Chen June 19, 2006 05:39PM

Re: z scores entered as DV for group analysis

Anthony Dick June 20, 2006 11:27AM