AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 07, 2008 10:36AM
Hi Beate,

It might be helpful to see both your make_stim_times.py and
3dDeconvolve commands.

1. What you did sounds okay to me. Note that you can make
one long line of 1200 lines (for 1200 seconds across 2
runs) as input to mask_stim_times.py, and it will output
a timing file for 2 runs.

What TR did you input to make_stim_times.py? Since your
stimuli were listed on a 1.0 second grid, that is the TR
you should have entered, rather that the 2.0 second TR
that your data is on.

Just look at the output files, and make sure the first and
last couple of stimulus times are correct for each run.

2. The 3dDeconvolve information message '-stim_times using TR=2 s'
looks okay. It should always be output and match your TR.

3. Using -stim_times, there does not need to be timing grid at
all. So you don't need to tell 3dDeconvolve that the times
are on a 1s grid. The stimulus times can be anything within
your run, that is one of the benefits of using -stim_times.

For example, a -stim_times file might has this for 2 runs:

23.4 56.7 89.012 89.68 92.555
12.8 13.1 14.5 96.8 113.2

Those times have nothing to do with the TR. Note that some
were only .3 or .67 seconds apart. It doesn't matter.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve

Beate February 06, 2008 04:58AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 07, 2008 10:36AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

Beate February 07, 2008 01:25PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 07, 2008 02:18PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

Beate February 08, 2008 03:39AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 08, 2008 09:23AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

Beate February 08, 2008 11:03AM