AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 07, 2008 02:18PM
That timing file looks okay to me, given what you have said
about it. So in run 1, all of the stimuli were in the first
half of that run. And in run 2, all of them were in the last
half.

The 331..560 times look good. Every stimulus time should be
between 0 and 600, since that file has one run per line. So
yes, I think you read the intention of my comment correctly.

My comment about using a 1200 line file would be to generate
the output in one make_stim_times.py command, instead of using
2 and concatenating the results. Either way should be correct.
What you are doing is fine, but just seems to be a little more
work than is necessary.

---

One other thing that I see is that your stimuli are actually in
pairs. Did you actually present pairs of stimuli that were 1
second apart, or was it a single stimulus that lasted 2 seconds?

- rick

Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve

Beate February 06, 2008 04:58AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 07, 2008 10:36AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

Beate February 07, 2008 01:25PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 07, 2008 02:18PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

Beate February 08, 2008 03:39AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 08, 2008 09:23AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve

Beate February 08, 2008 11:03AM