History of AFNI updates  

|
December 18, 2009 10:45AM
Hi Rick,

Thanks for the explanation. Actually I ran the analysis using BLOCK, but later when I ran the pure deconvolution process to estimate hrf's using CSPLIN, it happened to look that the hrf peaked around 7.5 sec instead of 5 sec. Please check the attached file which has estimated response from early visual cortex close to V1. Also estimated hrf in many other regions showed a small undershoot. So may be for this study it is better to use WAV instead of BLOCK.

-Srikanth.

Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth February 23, 2009 05:48PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds February 23, 2009 06:08PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth February 23, 2009 06:20PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds February 23, 2009 07:13PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth September 19, 2009 04:48PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds September 19, 2009 07:20PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth September 20, 2009 03:52PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

bob cox September 21, 2009 08:11AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth September 21, 2009 09:47AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth December 17, 2009 06:37PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

rick reynolds December 18, 2009 09:59AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Srikanth December 18, 2009 10:45AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve - stim_times option

Marc Ettlinger October 21, 2009 03:06PM