AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 22, 2009 09:14PM
My fault. One would think it difficult to mess up a 3dcopy
command, but I didn't pay enough attention and created another
AFNI dataset.

In any case, I took a closer look at the actual data and it
seems more likely that neither 3dcopy nor 3dAFNItoNIFTI is the
problem. The copied files actually seem correct. It is the
original dataset that does not.

The slice origin of the original dataset is 87.0 L, yet the
oblique matrix shows that it should be 81.35 L. When making
a copy to a NIfTI dataset, that matrix is re-applied upon
loading, creating a new origin of 81.35.

It is more likely that your original to3d program had a bug
that has long since been fixed (likely if the Dicom images
were Siemen's). If you still have the Dicom files, it would
be simple to verify.

Fixing this should not be a big deal, depending on which stage
of processing you actually want to modify. Some choices:

1. start over with the current to3d (good as a test, anyway)
2. fix the pre-aligned origin with 3drefit and re-do alignment
3. modify the newly created NIfTI datasets with nifti_tool

Do any of those seem good, given what you have done and still
need to do with the dataset?

- rick

Subject Author Posted

3dAFNItoNIFTI: small misalignment

Nick Oosterhof June 21, 2009 01:19PM

follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 10:45AM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 12:13PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 12:31PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 01:58PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 03:35PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 04:52PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 04:56PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 05:04PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 06:12PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 09:14PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Daniel Glen June 23, 2009 08:04AM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 23, 2009 09:44AM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations - OK

Nick Oosterhof June 24, 2009 07:47AM