AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Daniel Glen
June 23, 2009 08:04AM
To add to Rick's suggestions, the first two suggestions can be used with the "-oblique_origin" option for to3d and 3drefit. Normally in to3d, the origins are computed separately for the obliquity transformations and for the cardinal data for DICOM data. Usually these are the same anyway, but it's not clear which is more reliable for a particular manufacturer because of inconsistencies in their headers. To force the origin computed from the oblique info in the DICOM header, use the "-oblique_origin" option.

In any case, when a NIFTI dataset is created from an AFNI dataset, the oblique transformation (from the IJK_TO_DICOM_REAL attribute) and consequently the oblique origin is always used. To apply the origin from the IJK_TO_DICOM_REAL to an AFNI format dataset, use 3drefit -oblique_origin dset+orig. To remove obliquity information, use 3drefit -deoblique dset+orig.
Subject Author Posted

3dAFNItoNIFTI: small misalignment

Nick Oosterhof June 21, 2009 01:19PM

follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 10:45AM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 12:13PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 12:31PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 01:58PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 03:35PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 04:52PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 04:56PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 05:04PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 22, 2009 06:12PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

rick reynolds June 22, 2009 09:14PM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Daniel Glen June 23, 2009 08:04AM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations

Nick Oosterhof June 23, 2009 09:44AM

Re: follow-up: question about surface transformations - OK

Nick Oosterhof June 24, 2009 07:47AM