# 3dREMLfit¶

```
Usage: 3dREMLfit [options] ~1
**** Generalized least squares time series fit, with REML ****
**** estimation of the temporal auto-correlation structure. ****
---------------------------------------------------------------------
**** The recommended way to use 3dREMLfit is via afni_proc.py, ****
**** which will pre-process the data, and also give some useful ****
**** diagnostic tools/outputs for assessing the data's quality. ****
**** [afni_proc.py will make your FMRI-analysis life happier!] ****
---------------------------------------------------------------------
* This program provides a generalization of 3dDeconvolve:
it allows for serial correlation in the time series noise.
* It solves the linear equations for each voxel in the generalized
(prewhitened) least squares sense, using the REML estimation method
to find a best-fit ARMA(1,1) model for the time series noise
correlation matrix in each voxel (i.e., each voxel gets a separate
pair of ARMA parameters).
++ Note that the 2-parameter ARMA(1,1) correlation model is hard-coded
into this program -- there is no way to use a more elaborate model,
such as the 5-parameter ARMA(3,2), in 3dREMLfit.
++ A 'real' REML optimization of the autocorrelation model is made,
not simply an adjustment based on the residuals from a preliminary
OLSQ regression.
++ See the section 'What is ARMA(1,1)' (far below) for more fun details.
++ And the section 'What is REML' (even farther below).
* You MUST run 3dDeconvolve first to generate the input matrix
(.xmat.1D) file, which contains the hemodynamic regression
model, censoring and catenation information, the GLTs, etc.
See the output of '3dDeconvolve -help' for information on
using that program to setup the analysis.
++ However, you can input a 'naked' (non-3dDeconvolve) matrix
file using the '-matim' option, if you know what you are doing.
* If you don't want the 3dDeconvolve analysis to run, you can
prevent that by using 3dDeconvolve's '-x1D_stop' option.
* 3dDeconvolve also prints out a cognate command line for running
3dREMLfit, which should get you going with relative ease.
* The output datasets from 3dREMLfit are structured to resemble
the corresponding results from 3dDeconvolve, to make it
easy to adapt your scripts for further processing.
* Is this type of analysis (generalized least squares) important?
That depends on your point of view, your data, and your goals.
If you really want to know the answer, you should run
your analyses both ways (with 3dDeconvolve and 3dREMLfit),
through to the final step (e.g., group analysis), and then
decide if your neuroscience/brain conclusions depend strongly
on the type of linear regression that was used.
* If you are planning to use 3dMEMA for group analysis, then using
3dREMLfit instead of 3dDeconvolve is a good idea. 3dMEMA uses
the t-statistic of the beta weight as well as the beta weight
itself -- and the t-values from 3dREMLfit are probably more
more accurate than those from 3dDeconvolve, since the underlying
variance estimate should be more accurate (less biased).
* When there is significant temporal correlation, and you are using
'IM' regression (estimated individual betas for each event),
the REML GLSQ regression can be superior to OLSQ beta
estimates -- in the sense that the resulting betas
have somewhat less variance with GLSQ than with OLSQ.
-------------------------------------------
Input Options (the first two are mandatory) ~1
-------------------------------------------
-input ddd = Read time series dataset 'ddd'.
* This is the dataset without censoring!
* The '-matrix' file, on the other hand, encodes
which time points are to be censored, and the
matrix stored therein is already censored.
* The doc below has a discussion of censoring in 3dREMLfit:
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/htmldoc/statistics/remlfit.html
-matrix mmm = Read the matrix 'mmm', which should have been
output from 3dDeconvolve via the '-x1D' option.
** N.B.: You can omit entirely defining the regression matrix,
but then the program will fabricate a matrix consisting
of a single column with all 1s. This option is
mostly for the convenience of the author; for
example, to have some fun with an AR(1) time series:
1deval -num 1001 -expr 'gran(0,1)+(i-i)+0.7*z' > g07.1D
3dREMLfit -input g07.1D'{1..$}'' -Rvar -.1D -grid 5 -MAXa 0.9
** N.B.: 3dREMLfit now supports all zero columns, if you use
the '-GOFORIT' option. [Ides of March, MMX A.D.]
More Primitive Alternative Ways to Define the Regression Matrix
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-polort P = If no -matrix option is given, AND no -matim option,
create a matrix with Legendre polynomial regressors
up to order 'P'. The default value is P=0, which
produces a matrix with a single column of all ones.
(That is the default matrix described above.)
-matim M = Read a standard .1D file as the matrix.
* That is, an ASCII files of numbers layed out in a
rectangular array. The number of rows must equal the
number of time points in the input dataset. The number
of columns is the number of regressors.
* Advanced features, such as censoring, can only be implemented
by providing a true .xmat.1D file via the '-matrix' option.
** However, censoring can still be applied (in a way) by including
extra columns in the matrix. For example, to censor out time
point #47, a column that is 1 at time point #47 and zero at
all other time points can be used.
++ Remember that AFNI counting starts at 0, so this column
would start with 47 0s, then a single 1, then the rest
of the entries would be 0s.
++ 3dDeconvolve option '-x1D_regcensored' will create such a
.xmat.1D file, with the censoring indicated by 0-1 columns
rather than by the combination of 'GoodList' and omitted
rows. That is, instead of shrinking the matrix (by rows)
it will expand the matrix (by columns).
++ You can strip out the XML-ish header from the .xmat.1D
file with a Unix command like this:
grep -v '^#' Fred.xmat.1D > Fred.rawmat.1D
++ In cases with lots of censoring, expanding the matrix
by lots of columns will make 3dREMLfit run more slowly.
For most situations, this slowdown will not be horrific.
* An advanced intelligence could reverse engineer the XML
format used by the .xmat.1D files, to fully activate all the
regression features of this software :)
** N.B.: You can use only 'Col' as a name in GLTs ('-gltsym')
with these nonstandard matrix input methods, since
the other column names come from the '-matrix' file.
** These mutually exclusive options are ignored if -matrix is used.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The matrix supplied is the censored matrix, if any time points are marked
as to be removed from the analysis -- that is, if GoodList (infra) is NOT
the entire list of time points from 0..(nrow-1).
Information supplied in the .xmat.1D format XML header's attributes
includes the following (but is not limited to):
* ColumnLabels = a string label for each column in the matrix
* ColumnGroups = groupings of columns into associated regressors
(e.g., motion, baseline, task)
* RowTR = TR in seconds
* GoodList = list of time points to use (inverse of censor list)
* NRowFull = size of full matrix (without censoring)
* RunStart = time point indexes of start of the runs
* Nstim = number of distinct stimuli
* StimBots = column indexes for beginning of each stimulus's regressors
* StimTops = column indexes for ending of each stimulus's regressors
* StimLabels = names for each stimulus
* CommandLine = string of command used to create the file
See the doc below for a lengthier description of the matrix format:
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/htmldoc/statistics/remlfit.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Masking options ~1
---------------
-mask MMM = Read dataset 'MMM' as a mask for the input; voxels outside
the mask will not be fit by the regression model.
-automask = If you don't know what this does by now, I'm not telling.
*** If you don't specify ANY mask, the program will
build one automatically (from each voxel's RMS)
and use this mask SOLELY for the purpose of
computing the FDR curves in the bucket dataset's header.
* If you DON'T want this to happen, then use '-noFDR'
and later run '3drefit -addFDR' on the bucket dataset.
* To be precise, the FDR automask is only built if
the input dataset has at least 5 voxels along each of
the x and y axes, to avoid applying it when you run
3dREMLfit on 1D timeseries inputs.
-STATmask ss = Build a mask from file 'ss', and use this for the purpose
of computing the FDR curves.
* The actual results ARE not masked with this option
(only with '-mask' or '-automask' options).
* If you don't use '-STATmask', then the mask from
'-mask' or '-automask' is used for the FDR work.
If neither of those is given, then the automatically
generated mask described just above is used for FDR.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options to Add Baseline (Null Hypothesis) Columns to the Regression Matrix ~1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-addbase bb = You can add baseline model columns to the matrix with
this option. Each column in the .1D file 'bb' will
be appended to the matrix. This file must have at
least as many rows as the matrix does.
* Multiple -addbase options can be used, if needed.
* More than 1 file can be specified, as in
-addbase fred.1D ethel.1D elvis.1D
* None of the .1D filename can start with the '-' character,
since that is the signal for the next option.
* If the matrix from 3dDeconvolve was censored, then
this file (and '-slibase' files) can either be
censored to match, OR 3dREMLfit will censor these
.1D files for you.
+ If the column length (number of rows) of the .1D file
is the same as the column length of the censored
matrix, then the .1D file WILL NOT be censored.
+ If the column length of the .1D file is the same
as the column length of the uncensored matrix,
then the .1D file WILL be censored -- the same
rows excised from the matrix in 3dDeconvolve will
be resected from the .1D file before the .1D file's
columns are appended to the matrix.
+ The censoring information from 3dDeconvolve is stored
in the matrix file header, and you don't have to
provide it again on the 3dREMLfit command line.
-dsort dset = Similar to -addbase in concept, BUT the dataset 'dset'
provides a different baseline regressor for every
voxel. This dataset must have the same number of
time points as the input dataset, and have the same
number of voxels. [Added 22 Jul 2015]
+ The REML (a,b) estimation is done WITHOUT this extra
voxel-wise regressor, and then the selected (a,b)
ARMA parameters are used to do the final regression for
the '-R...' output datasets. This method is not ideal,
but the alternative of re-doing the (a,b) estimation with
a different matrix for each voxel would be VERY slow.
-- The -dsort estimation is thus different from the -addbase
and/or -slibase estimations, in that the latter cases
incorporate the extra regressors into the REML estimation
of the ARMA (a,b) parameters. The practical difference
between these two methods is usually very small ;-)
+ If any voxel time series from -dsort is constant through time,
the program will print a warning message, and peculiar things
might happen. Gleeble, fitzwilly, blorten, et cetera.
-- Actually, if this event happens, the 'offending' -dsort voxel
time series is replaced by the mean time series from that
-dsort dataset.
+ The '-Rbeta' (and/or '-Obeta') option will include the
fit coefficient for the -dsort regressor (last).
+ There is no way to include the -dsort regressor beta in a GLT.
+ You can use -dsort more than once. Please don't go crazy.
+ Using this option slows the program down in the GLSQ loop,
since a new matrix and GLT set must be built up and torn down
for each voxel separately.
-- At this time, the GLSQ loop is not OpenMP-ized.
+++ This voxel-wise regression capability is NOT implemented in
3dDeconvolve, so you'll have to use 3dREMLfit if you want
to use this method, even if you only want ordinary least
squares regression.
+ The motivation for -dsort is to apply ANATICOR to task-based
FMRI analyses. You might be clever and have a better idea!?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2897154/
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/program_help/afni_proc.py.html
-dsort_nods = If '-dsort' is used, the output datasets reflect the impact of the
voxel-wise regressor(s). If you want to compare those results
to the case where you did NOT give the '-dsort' option, then
also use '-dsort_nods' (nods is short for 'no dsort').
The linear regressions will be repeated without the -dsort
regressor(s) and the results put into datasets with the string
'_nods' added to the prefix.
-slibase bb = Similar to -addbase in concept, BUT each .1D file 'bb'
must have an integer multiple of the number of slices
in the input dataset; then, separate regression
matrices are generated for each slice, with the
[0] column of 'bb' appended to the matrix for
the #0 slice of the dataset, the [1] column of 'bb'
appended to the matrix for the #1 slice of the dataset,
and so on. For example, if the dataset has 3 slices
and file 'bb' has 6 columns, then the order of use is
bb[0] --> slice #0 matrix
bb[1] --> slice #1 matrix
bb[2] --> slice #2 matrix
bb[3] --> slice #0 matrix
bb[4] --> slice #1 matrix
bb[5] --> slice #2 matrix
** If this order is not correct, consider -slibase_sm.
* Intended to help model physiological noise in FMRI,
or other effects you want to regress out that might
change significantly in the inter-slice time intervals.
* Slices are the 3rd dimension in the dataset storage
order -- 3dinfo can tell you what that direction is:
Data Axes Orientation:
first (x) = Right-to-Left
second (y) = Anterior-to-Posterior
third (z) = Inferior-to-Superior [-orient RAI]
In the above example, the slice direction is from
Inferior to Superior, so the columns in the '-slibase'
input file should be ordered in that direction as well.
* '-slibase' will slow the program down, and make it use
a lot more memory (to hold all the matrix stuff).
*** At this time, 3dSynthesize has no way of incorporating the
extra baseline timeseries from -addbase or -slibase or -dsort.
*** Also see option '-dsort' for how to include voxel-dependent
regressors into the analysis.
-slibase_sm bb = Similar to -slibase above, BUT each .1D file 'bb'
must be in slice major order (i.e. all slice0 columns
come first, then all slice1 columns, etc).
For example, if the dataset has 3 slices and file
'bb' has 6 columns, then the order of use is
bb[0] --> slice #0 matrix, regressor 0
bb[1] --> slice #0 matrix, regressor 1
bb[2] --> slice #1 matrix, regressor 0
bb[3] --> slice #1 matrix, regressor 1
bb[4] --> slice #2 matrix, regressor 0
bb[5] --> slice #2 matrix, regressor 1
** If this order is not correct, consider -slibase.
-usetemp = Write intermediate stuff to disk, to economize on RAM.
Using this option might be necessary to run with
'-slibase' and with '-Grid' values above the default,
since the program has to store a large number of
matrices for such a problem: two for every slice and
for every (a,b) pair in the ARMA parameter grid.
* '-usetemp' can actually speed the program up, interestingly,
even if you have enough RAM to hold all the intermediate
matrices needed with '-slibase'. YMMV :)
* '-usetemp' also writes temporary files to store dataset
results, which can help if you are creating multiple large
dataset (e.g., -Rfitts and -Rerrts in the same program run).
* Temporary files are written to the directory given
in environment variable TMPDIR, or in /tmp, or in ./
(preference is in that order).
+ If the program crashes, these files are named
REML_somethingrandom, and you might have to
delete them manually.
+ If the program ends normally, it will delete
these temporary files before it exits.
+ Several gigabytes of disk space might be used
for this temporary storage!
+ When running on a cluster, or some other system
using networked storage, '-usetemp' will work
MUCH better if the temporary storage directory
is a local drive rather than a networked drive.
You will have to figure out how to do this on
your cluster, since configurations vary so much.
* If you are at the NIH, then see this Web page:
https://hpc.nih.gov/docs/userguide.html#local
* If the program crashes with a 'malloc failure' type of
message, then try '-usetemp' (malloc=memory allocator).
*** NOTE THIS: If a Unix program stops suddenly with the
mysterious one word message 'killed', then it
almost certainly ran over some computer system
limitations, and was immediately stopped without
any recourse. Usually the resource it ran out
of is memory. So if this happens to you when
running 3dREMLfit, try using the '-usetemp' option!
* '-usetemp' disables OpenMP multi-CPU usage.
Only use this option if you need to, since OpenMP should
speed the program up significantly on multi-CPU computers.
-nodmbase = By default, baseline columns added to the matrix
via '-addbase' or '-slibase' or '-dsort' will each have
their mean removed (as is done in 3dDeconvolve). If you
do NOT want this operation performed, use '-nodmbase'.
* Using '-nodmbase' would make sense if you used
'-polort -1' to set up the matrix in 3dDeconvolve, and/or
you actually care about the fit coefficients of the extra
baseline columns (in which case, don't use '-nobout').
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Output Options (at least one must be given; 'ppp' = dataset prefix name) ~1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Rvar ppp = dataset for saving REML variance parameters
* See the 'What is ARMA(1,1)' section, far below.
* This dataset has 6 volumes:
[0] = 'a' = ARMA parameter
= decay rate of correlations with lag
[1] = 'b' = ARMA parameter
[2] = 'lam' = (b+a)(1+a*b)/(1+2*a*b+b*b)
= correlation at lag=1
correlation at lag=k is lam * a^(k-1) (k>0)
[3] = 'StDev' = standard deviation of prewhitened
residuals (used in computing statistics
in '-Rbuck' and in GLTs)
[4] = '-LogLik' = negative of the REML log-likelihood
function (see the math notes)
[5] = 'LjungBox'= Ljung-Box statistic of the pre-whitened
residuals, an indication of how much
temporal correlation is left-over.
+ See the 'Other Commentary' section far below
for a little more information on the LB
statistic.
* The main purpose of this dataset is to check when weird
things happen in the calculations. Or just to have fun.
-Rbeta ppp = dataset for beta weights from the REML estimation
[similar to the -cbucket output from 3dDeconvolve]
* This dataset will contain all the beta weights, for
baseline and stimulus regressors alike, unless the
'-nobout' option is given -- in that case, this
dataset will only get the betas for the stimulus
regressors.
-Rbuck ppp = dataset for beta + statistics from the REML estimation;
also contains the results of any GLT analysis requested
in the 3dDeconvolve setup.
[similar to the -bucket output from 3dDeconvolve]
* This dataset does NOT get the betas (or statistics) of
those regressors marked as 'baseline' in the matrix file.
* If the matrix file from 3dDeconvolve does not contain
'Stim attributes' (which will happen if all inputs
to 3dDeconvolve were labeled as '-stim_base'), then
-Rbuck won't work, since it is designed to give the
statistics for the 'stimuli' and there aren't any matrix
columns labeled as being 'stimuli'.
* In such a case, to get statistics on the coefficients,
you'll have to use '-gltsym' and '-Rglt'; for example,
to get t-statistics for all coefficients from #0 to #77:
-tout -Rglt Colstats -gltsym 'SYM: Col[[0..77]]' ColGLT
where 'Col[3]' is the generic label that refers to matrix
column #3, et cetera.
* FDR curves for so many statistics (78 in the example)
might take a long time to generate!
-Rglt ppp = dataset for beta + statistics from the REML estimation,
but ONLY for the GLTs added on the 3dREMLfit command
line itself via '-gltsym'; GLTs from 3dDeconvolve's
command line will NOT be included.
* Intended to give an easy way to get extra contrasts
after an earlier 3dREMLfit run.
* Use with '-ABfile vvv' to read the (a,b) parameters
from the earlier run, where 'vvv' is the '-Rvar'
dataset output from that run.
[If you didn't save the '-Rvar' file, then it will]
[be necessary to redo the REML loop, which is slow]
-fout = put F-statistics into the bucket dataset
-rout = put R^2 statistics into the bucket dataset
-tout = put t-statistics into the bucket dataset
[if you use -Rbuck and do not give any of -fout, -tout,]
[or -rout, then the program assumes -fout is activated.]
-noFDR = do NOT add FDR curve data to bucket datasets
[FDR curves can take a long time if -tout is used]
-nobout = do NOT add baseline (null hypothesis) regressor betas
to the -Rbeta and/or -Obeta output datasets.
['stimulus' columns are marked in the .xmat.1D matrix ]
[file; all other matrix columns are 'baseline' columns]
-Rfitts ppp = dataset for REML fitted model
[like 3dDeconvolve, a censored time point gets]
[the actual data values from that time index!!]
-Rerrts ppp = dataset for REML residuals = data - fitted model
[like 3dDeconvolve, a censored time]
[point gets its residual set to zero]
-Rwherr ppp = dataset for REML residual, whitened using the
estimated ARMA(1,1) correlation matrix of the noise
[Note that the whitening matrix used is the inverse ]
[of the Choleski factor of the correlation matrix C; ]
[however, the whitening matrix isn't uniquely defined]
[(any matrix W with C=inv(W'W) will work), so other ]
[whitening schemes could be used and these would give]
[different whitened residual time series datasets. ]
-gltsym g h = read a symbolic GLT from file 'g' and label it with
string 'h'
* As in 3dDeconvolve, you can also use the 'SYM:' method
to put the definition of the GLT directly on the
command line.
* The symbolic labels for the stimuli are as provided
in the matrix file, from 3dDeconvolve.
*** Unlike 3dDeconvolve, you supply the label 'h' for
the output coefficients and statistics directly
after the matrix specification 'g'.
* Like 3dDeconvolve, the matrix generated by the
symbolic expression will be printed to the screen
unless environment variable AFNI_GLTSYM_PRINT is NO.
* These GLTs are in addition to those stored in the
matrix file, from 3dDeconvolve.
* If you don't create a bucket dataset using one of
-Rbuck or -Rglt (or -Obuck / -Oglt), using
-gltsym is completely pointless and stupid!
** Besides the stimulus labels read from the matrix
file (put there by 3dDeconvolve), you can refer
to regressor columns in the matrix using the
symbolic name 'Col', which collectively means
all the columns in the matrix. 'Col' is a way
to test '-addbase' and/or '-slibase' regressors
for significance; for example, if you have a
matrix with 10 columns from 3dDeconvolve and
add 2 extra columns to it, then you could use
-gltsym 'SYM: Col[[10..11]]' Addons -tout -fout
to create a GLT to include both of the added
columns (numbers 10 and 11).
-- 'Col' cannot be used to test the '-dsort'
regressor for significance!
The options below let you get the Ordinary Least SQuares outputs
(without adjustment for serial correlation), for comparisons.
These datasets should be essentially identical to the results
you would get by running 3dDeconvolve (with the '-float' option!):
-Ovar ppp = dataset for OLSQ st.dev. parameter (kind of boring)
-Obeta ppp = dataset for beta weights from the OLSQ estimation
-Obuck ppp = dataset for beta + statistics from the OLSQ estimation
-Oglt ppp = dataset for beta + statistics from '-gltsym' options
-Ofitts ppp = dataset for OLSQ fitted model
-Oerrts ppp = dataset for OLSQ residuals (data - fitted model)
[there is no -Owherr option; if you don't]
[see why, then think about it for a while]
Note that you don't have to use any of the '-R' options; you could
use 3dREMLfit just for the '-O' options if you want. In that case,
the program will skip the time consuming ARMA(1,1) estimation for
each voxel, by pretending you used the option '-ABfile =0,0'.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The following options control the ARMA(1,1) parameter estimation ~1
for each voxel time series; normally, you do not need these options
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-MAXa am = Set max allowed AR a parameter to 'am' (default=0.8).
The range of a values scanned is 0 .. +am (-POScor)
or is -am .. +am (-NEGcor).
-MAXb bm = Set max allow MA b parameter to 'bm' (default=0.8).
The range of b values scanned is -bm .. +bm.
* The largest value allowed for am and bm is 0.9.
* The smallest value allowed for am and bm is 0.1.
* For a nearly pure AR(1) model, use '-MAXb 0.1'
* For a nearly pure MA(1) model, use '-MAXa 0.1'
-Grid pp = Set the number of grid divisions in the (a,b) grid
to be 2^pp in each direction over the range 0..MAX.
The default (and minimum) value for 'pp' is 3.
Larger values will provide a finer resolution
in a and b, but at the cost of some CPU time.
* To be clear, the default settings use a grid
with 8 divisions in the a direction and 16 in
the b direction (since a is non-negative but
b can be either sign).
* If -NEGcor is used, then '-Grid 3' means 16 divisions
in each direction, so that the grid spacing is 0.1
if MAX=0.8. Similarly, '-Grid 4' means 32 divisions
in each direction, '-Grid 5' means 64 divisions, etc.
* I see no reason why you would ever use a -Grid size
greater than 5 (==> parameter resolution = 0.025).
++ However, if you like burning up CPU time, values up
to '-Grid 7' are allowed :)
* In the future, '-Grid 5' might become the default, since
it is a little more accurate and computers are a lot
faster than in the days when I was hunting brontosauri.
* In my limited experiments, there was little appreciable
difference in activation maps between '-Grid 3' and
'-Grid 5', especially at the group analysis level.
++ To be fair, skipping prewhitening by using OLSQ
(e.g., 3dDeconvolve) at the single subject level
has little effect on the group analysis UNLESS you
are going to use 3dMEMA, which relies on accurate
single subject t-statistics, which in turn requires
accurate temporal autocorrelation modeling.
++ If you are interested in the REML parameters themselves,
or in getting the 'best' prewhitening possible, then
'-Grid 5' makes sense.
* The program is somewhat slower as the -Grid size expands.
And uses more memory, to hold various matrices for
each (a,b) case.
-NEGcor = Allows negative correlations to be used; the default
is that only positive correlations are searched.
When this option is used, the range of a scanned
is -am .. +am; otherwise, it is 0 .. +am.
* Note that when -NEGcor is used, the number of grid
points in the a direction doubles to cover the
range -am .. 0; this will slow the program down.
-POScor = Do not allow negative correlations. Since this is
the default, you don't actually need this option.
[FMRI data doesn't seem to need the modeling ]
[of negative correlations, but you never know.]
-WNplus = Do not allow negative correlations, AND only allow
(a,b) parameter combinations that fit the model
AR(1) + white noise:
* a > 0 and -a < b < 0
* see 'What is ARMA(1,1)' far below
* you should use '-Grid 5' with this option, since
it restricts the number of possible ARMA(1,1) models
-Mfilt mr = After finding the best fit parameters for each voxel
in the mask, do a 3D median filter to smooth these
parameters over a ball with radius 'mr' mm, and then
use THOSE parameters to compute the final output.
* If mr < 0, -mr is the ball radius in voxels,
instead of millimeters.
[No median filtering is done unless -Mfilt is used.]
* This option is not recommended; it is just here for
experimentation.
-CORcut cc = The exact ARMA(1,1) correlation matrix (for a != 0)
has no non-zero entries. The calculations in this
program set correlations below a cutoff to zero.
The default cutoff is 0.00010, but can be altered with
this option. The usual reason to use this option is
to test the sensitivity of the results to the cutoff.
-ABfile ff = Instead of estimating the ARMA(a,b) parameters from the
data, read them from dataset 'ff', which should have
2 float-valued sub-bricks.
* Note that the (a,b) values read from this file will
be mapped to the nearest ones on the (a,b) grid
before being used to solve the generalized least
squares problem. For this reason, you may want
to use '-Grid 5' to make the (a,b) grid finer, if
you are not using (a,b) values from a -Rvar file.
* Using this option will skip the slowest part of
the program, which is the scan for each voxel
to find its optimal (a,b) parameters.
* One possible application of -ABfile:
+ save (a,b) using -Rvar in 3dREMLfit
+ process them in some way (spatial smoothing?)
+ use these modified values for fitting in 3dREMLfit
[you should use '-Grid 5' for such a case]
* Another possible application of -ABfile:
+ use (a,b) from -Rvar to speed up a run with -Rglt
when you want to run some more contrast tests.
* Special case:
-ABfile =0.7,-0.3
e.g., means to use a=0.7 and b=-0.3 for all voxels.
The program detects this special case by looking for
'=' as the first character of the string 'ff' and
looking for a comma in the middle of the string.
The values of a and b must be in the range -0.9..+0.9.
* The purpose of this special case is to facilitate
comparison with Software PrograMs that use the same
temporal correlation structure for all voxels.
-GOFORIT = 3dREMLfit checks the regression matrix for tiny singular
values (as 3dDeconvolve does). If the matrix is too
close to being rank-deficient, then the program will
not proceed. You can use this option to force the
program to continue past such a failed collinearity
check, but you MUST check your results to see if they
make sense!
** '-GOFORIT' is required if there are all zero columns
in the regression matrix. However, at this time
[15 Mar 2010], the all zero columns CANNOT come from
the '-slibase' inputs.
** Nor from the '-dsort' inputs.
** If there are all zero columns in the matrix, a number
of WARNING messages will be generated as the program
pushes forward in the solution of the linear systems.
---------------------
Miscellaneous Options ~1
---------------------
-quiet = turn off most progress messages :(
-verb = turn on more progress messages :)
==========================================================================
=========== Various Notes (as if this help weren't long enough) =========
==========================================================================
------------------
What is ARMA(1,1)? ~1
------------------
* The correlation coefficient r(k) of noise samples k units apart in time,
for k >= 1, is given by r(k) = lam * a^(k-1)
where lam = (b+a)(1+a*b)/(1+2*a*b+b*b)
(N.B.: lam=a when b=0 -- AR(1) noise has r(k)=a^k for k >= 0)
(N.B.: lam=b when a=0 -- MA(1) noise has r(k)=b for k=1, r(k)=0 for k>1)
* lam can be bigger or smaller than a, depending on the sign of b:
b > 0 means lam > a; b < 0 means lam < a.
* What I call (a,b) here is sometimes called (p,q) in the ARMA literature.
* For a noise model which is the sum of AR(1) and white noise, 0 < lam < a
(i.e., a > 0 and -a < b < 0 ). Thus, the model 'AR(1)+white noise'
is a proper subset of ARMA(1,1) -- and also a proper subset of the default
-POScor setting (which also allows 0 < a < lam via b > 0).
+ This restricted model can be specified with the '-WNplus' option.
With '-WNplus', you should use '-Grid 5', since you are restricting
the number of available noise models fairly substantially.
+ If the variance of the white noise is T and the variance of the AR(1) noise
is U, then lam = (a*U)/(U+T*(1-a^2)), and U/T = (lam*(1-a^2))/(a^2-lam).
+ In principal, one could estimate the fraction of the noise that is
white vs. correlated using this U/T formula (e.g., via 3dcalc on the
'-Rvar' output).
+ It is not clear that such an estimate is useful for any purpose,
or indeed that the '-Rvar' outputs of the ARMA(1,1) parameters
are useful for more than code testing reasons. YMMV :)
* The natural range of a and b is -1..+1. However, unless -NEGcor is
given, only non-negative values of a will be used, and only values
of b that give lam > 0 will be allowed. Also, the program doesn't
allow values of a or b to be outside the range -0.9..+0.9.
* The program sets up the correlation matrix using the censoring and run
start information saved in the header of the .xmat.1D matrix file, so
that the actual correlation matrix used will not always be Toeplitz.
For details of how time series with such gaps are analyzed, see the
math notes.
* The 'Rvar' dataset has 5 sub-bricks with variance parameter estimates:
#0 = a = factor by which correlations decay from lag k to lag k+1
#1 = b parameter
#2 = lam (see the formula above) = correlation at lag 1
#3 = standard deviation of ARMA(1,1) noise in that voxel
#4 = -log(REML likelihood function) = optimized function at (a,b)
For details about this, see the math notes.
* The 'Rbeta' dataset has the beta (model fit) parameters estimates
computed from the prewhitened time series data in each voxel,
as in 3dDeconvolve's '-cbucket' output, in the order in which
they occur in the matrix. -addbase and -slibase and -dsort beta
values come last in this file.
[The '-nobout' option will disable output of baseline parameters.]
* The 'Rbuck' dataset has the beta parameters and their statistics
mixed together, as in 3dDeconvolve's '-bucket' output.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
What is REML = REsidual (or REstricted) Maximum Likelihood, anyway? ~1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
* Ordinary Least SQuares (which assumes the noise correlation matrix is
the identity) is consistent for estimating regression parameters,
but is NOT consistent for estimating the noise variance if the
noise is significantly correlated in time - 'serial correlation'
or 'temporal correlation'.
* Maximum likelihood estimation (ML) of the regression parameters and
variance/correlation together is asymptotically consistent as the
number of samples goes to infinity, but the variance estimates
might still have significant bias at a 'reasonable' number of
data points.
* REML estimates the variance/correlation parameters in a space
of residuals -- the part of the data left after the model fit
is subtracted. The amusing/cunning part is that the model fit
used to define the residuals is itself the generalized least
squares fit where the variance/correlation matrix is the one found
by the REML fit itself. This feature makes REML estimation nonlinear,
and the REML equations are usually solved iteratively, to maximize
the log-likelihood in the restricted space. In this program, the
REML function is instead simply optimized over a finite grid of
the correlation matrix parameters a and b. The matrices for each
(a,b) pair are pre-calculated in the setup phase, and then are
re-used in the voxel loop. The purpose of this grid-based method
is speed -- optimizing iteratively to a highly accurate (a,b)
estimation for each voxel would be very time consuming, and pretty
pointless. If you are concerned about the sensitivity of the
results to the resolution of the (a,b) grid, you can use the
'-Grid 5' option to increase this resolution and see if your
activation maps change significantly. In test cases, the resulting
betas and statistics have not changed appreciably between '-Grid 3'
and '-Grid 5'; however, you might want to test this on your own data
(just for fun, because who doesn't want more fun?).
* REML estimates of the variance/correlation parameters are still
biased, but are generally significantly less biased than ML estimates.
Also, the regression parameters (betas) should be estimated somewhat
more accurately (i.e., with smaller variance than OLSQ). However,
this effect is generally small in FMRI data, and probably won't affect
your group results noticeably (if you don't carry parameter variance
estimates to the inter-subject analysis, as is done in 3dMEMA).
* After the (a,b) parameters are estimated, then the solution to the
linear system is available via Generalized Least SQuares; that is,
via prewhitening using the Choleski factor of the estimated
variance/covariance matrix.
* In the case with b=0 (that is, AR(1) correlations), and if there are
no time gaps (no censoring, no run breaks), then it is possible to
directly estimate the a parameter without using REML. This program
does not implement such a method (e.g., the Yule-Walker equation).
The reasons why should be obvious.
* If you like linear algebra, see my scanned math notes about 3dREMLfit:
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/misc/3dREMLfit/3dREMLfit_mathnotes.pdf
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/htmldoc/statistics/remlfit.html
* I have been asked if 3dREMLfit prewhitens the design matrix as well as
the data. The short answer to this somewhat uninformed question is YES.
The long answer follows (warning: math ahead!):
* Mathematically, the GLSQ solution is expressed as
f = inv[ X' inv(R) X] X' inv(R) y
where X = model matrix, R = symmetric correlation matrix
of noise (R depends on the a,b parameters),
f = parameter estimates, and y = data vector.
Notation: ' = transpose, inv() = inverse matrix.
A symmetric matrix S such that SS = R is called a square root of R
(there are many such matrices). The matrix inv(S) is a prewhitening
matrix. That is, if the noise vector q is such that E(q q') = R
(here E = expected value), and vector t = inv(S) q, then
E(t t') = E[ inv(S)q q'inv(S) ] = inv(S) S S inv(S) = I.
Note that inv(R) = inv(S) inv(S), and we can rewrite the GLSQ solution as
f = inv[ X' inv(S) inv(S) X ] X' inv(S) inv(S) y
= inv[ (inv(S)X)' (inv(S)X) ] (inv(S)X)' (inv(S)y)
so the GLSQ solution is equivalent to the OLSQ solution, with the model
matrix X replaced by inv(S)X and the data vector y replaced by inv(S)y;
that is, we prewhiten both of them. In 3dREMLfit, this is done implicitly
in the solution method outlined in the 7-step procedure on the fourth page
of my math notes -- a procedure designed for efficient implementation
with banded R. The prewhitened X matrix is never explicitly computed:
it is not needed, since the goal is to compute vector f, not inv(S)X.
* The idea of pre-whitening the data but NOT the matrix is a very bad plan.
(This also was a suggestion by a not-well-informed user.)
If you work through the linear algebra, you'll see that the resulting
estimate for f is not statistically consistent with the underlying model!
In other words, prewhitening only the data but not the matrix is WRONG.
* Someone asking the question above might actually be asking if the residuals
are whitened. The answer is YES and NO. The output of -Rerrts is not
whitened; in the above notation, -Rerrts gives y-Xf = data - model fit.
The output of -Rwherr is whitened; -Rwherr gives S[y-Xf], which is the
residual (eps) vector for the pre-whitened linear system Sf = SXf + eps.
* The estimation method for (a,b) is nonlinear; that is, these parameters
are NOT estimated by doing an initial OLSQ (or any other one-shot initial
calculation), then fitting (a,b) to the resulting residuals. Rather,
a number of different (a,b) values are tried out to find the parameter pair
where the log-likelihood of the Gaussian model is optimized. To be precise,
the function that is minimized in each voxel (over the discrete a,b grid) is
L(a,b) = log(det(R(a,b))) + log(det(X' inv(R(a,b)) X))
+ (n-m)log(y'P(a,b)y) - log(det(X'X'))
where R(a,b) = ARMA(1,1) correlation matrix (symetric n X n)
n = dimension of data vector = number of rows in X
m = number of columns in X = number of regressors
y = data vector for a given voxel
P(a,b) = prewhitening projection matrix (symmetric n X n)
= inv(R) - inv(R)X inv(X' inv(R) X) X' inv(R)
The first 2 terms in L only depend on the (a,b) parameters, and can be
thought of as a penalty that favors some (a,b) values over others,
independent of the data -- for ARMA(1,1), the a=b=0 white noise
model is penalized somewhat relative to the non-white noise cases.
The 3rd term uses the 2-norm of the prewhitened residuals.
The 4th term depends only on X, and is not actually used herein, since
we don't include a model for varying X as well as R.
* The method for estimating (a,b) does not require the time series data to be
perfectly uniform in time. Gaps due to censoring and run break are allowed
for properly.
* Again, see the math notes for more fun fun algorithmic details:
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/misc/3dREMLfit/3dREMLfit_mathnotes.pdf
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/htmldoc/statistics/remlfit.html
----------------
Other Commentary ~1
----------------
* Again: the ARMA(1,1) parameters 'a' (AR) and 'b' (MA) are estimated
only on a discrete grid, for the sake of CPU time.
* Each voxel gets a separate pair of 'a' and 'b' parameters.
There is no option to estimate global values for 'a' and 'b'
and use those for all voxels. Such an approach might be called
'kindergarten statistics' by the promulgators of Some People's Methods.
* OLSQ = Ordinary Least SQuares; these outputs can be used to compare
the REML/GLSQ estimations with the simpler OLSQ results
(and to test this program vs. 3dDeconvolve).
* GLSQ = Generalized Least SQuares = estimated linear system solution
taking into account the variance/covariance matrix of the noise.
* The '-matrix' file must be from 3dDeconvolve; besides the regression
matrix itself, the header contains the stimulus labels, the GLTs,
the censoring information, etc.
+ Although you can put in a 'raw' matrix using the '-matim' option,
described earlier.
* If you don't actually want the OLSQ results from 3dDeconvolve, you can
make that program stop after the X matrix file is written out by using
the '-x1D_stop' option, and then running 3dREMLfit; something like this:
3dDeconvolve -bucket Fred -nodata 800 2.5 -x1D_stop ...
3dREMLfit -matrix Fred.xmat.1D -input ...
In the above example, no 3D dataset is input to 3dDeconvolve, so as to
avoid the overhead of having to read it in for no reason. Instead,
the '-nodata 800 2.5' option is used to setup the time series of the
desired length (corresponding to the real data's length, here 800 points),
and the appropriate TR (here, 2.5 seconds). This will properly establish
the size and timing of the matrix file.
* The bucket output datasets are structured to mirror the output
from 3dDeconvolve with the default options below:
-nobout -full_first
Note that you CANNOT use options like '-bout', '-nocout', and
'-nofull_first' with 3dREMLfit -- the bucket datasets are ordered
the way they are and you'll just have to live with it.
* If the 3dDeconvolve matrix generation step did NOT have any non-base
stimuli (i.e., everything was '-stim_base'), then there are no 'stimuli'
in the matrix file. In that case, since by default 3dREMLfit doesn't
compute statistics of baseline parameters, to get statistics you will
have to use the '-gltsym' option here, specifying the desired column
indexes with the 'Col[]' notation, and then use '-Rglt' to get these
values saved somewhere (since '-Rbuck' won't work if there are no
'Stim attributes').
* All output datasets are in float format [i.e., no '-short' option].
Internal calculations are done in double precision.
* If the regression matrix (including any added columns from '-addbase'
or '-slibase') is rank-deficient (e.g., has collinear columns),
then the program will print a message something like
** ERROR: X matrix has 1 tiny singular value -- collinearity
The program will NOT continue past this type of error, unless
the '-GOFORIT' option is used. You should examine your results
carefully to make sure they are reasonable (e.g., look at
the fitted model overlay on the input time series).
* The Ljung-Box (LB) statistic computed via the '-Rvar' option is a
measure of how correlated the ARMA(1,1) pre-whitened residuals are
in time. A 'small' value indicates that the pre-whitening was
reasonably successful (e.g., small LB = 'good').
+ The LB volume will be marked as a chi-squared statistic with h-2 degrees
of freedom, where 'h' is the semi-arbitrarily chosen maximum lag used.
A large LB value indicates noticeable temporal correlation in the
pre-whitened residuals (e.g., that the ARMA(1,1) model wasn't adequate).
+ If a voxel has LB statistic = 0, this means that the LB value could not
be computed for some reason (e.g., residuals are all zero).
+ For yet more information, see this article:
On a measure of lack of fit in time series models.
GM Ljung, GEP Box. Biometrika, 1978.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2335207
https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article/65/2/297/236869
+ The calculation of the LB statistic is adjusted to allow for gaps in
the time series (e.g., censoring, run gaps).
+ Note that the LB statistic is computed if and only if you give the
'-Rvar' option. You don't have to give the '-Rwherr' option, which is
used to save the pre-whitened residuals to a dataset.
+ If you want to test the LB statistic calculation under the null
hypothesis (i.e., that the ARMA(1,1) model is correct), then
you can use program 3dSimARMA11 to create a time series dataset,
then run that through 3dREMLfit, then peruse the histogram
of the resulting LB statistic. Have fun!
* Depending on the matrix and the options, you might expect CPU time
to be about 2..4 times that of the corresponding 3dDeconvolve run.
+ A careful choice of algorithms for solving the multiple linear
systems required (e.g., QR method, sparse matrix operations,
bordering, etc.) and some other code optimizations make
running 3dREMLfit tolerable.
+ Especially on modern fast CPUs. Kids these days have NO idea
about how we used to suffer waiting for computer runs, and
how we passed the time by walking uphill through the snow.
---------------------------------------------------------------
How 3dREMLfit handles all zero columns in the regression matrix
---------------------------------------------------------------
* One salient (to the user) difference from 3dDeconvolve is how
3dREMLfit deals with the beta weight from an all zero column when
computing a statistic (e.g., a GLT). The beta weight will simply
be ignored, and its entry in the GLT matrix will be set to zero.
Any all zero rows in the GLT matrix are then removed. For example,
the 'Full_Fstat' for a model with 3 beta weights is computed from
the GLT matrix [ 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 1 0 ]
[ 0 0 1 ]. If the last beta weight corresponds to
an all zero column, then the matrix becomes [ 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 1 0 ]
[ 0 0 0 ], and then
then last row is omitted. This excision reduces the number of
numerator degrees of freedom in this test from 3 to 2. The net
effect is that the F-statistic will be larger than in 3dDeconvolve,
which does not modify the GLT matrix (or its equivalent).
* A similar adjustment is made to denominator degrees of freedom, which
is usually n-m, where n=# of data points and m=# of regressors.
3dDeconvolve counts all zero regressors in with m, but 3dREMLfit
does not. The net effect is again to (slightly) increase F-statistic
values over the equivalent 3dDeconvolve computation.
-----------------------------------------------------------
To Dream the Impossible Dream, to Write the Uncodeable Code
-----------------------------------------------------------
* Add options for -iresp/-sresp for -stim_times.
* Prevent Daniel Glen from referring to this program as 3dARMAgeddon.
* Establish incontrovertibly the nature of quantum mechanical observation.
* Create an iPad version of the AFNI software suite.
* Get people to stop asking me 'quick questions'!
----------------------------------------------------------
* For more information, please see the contents of
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/misc/3dREMLfit/3dREMLfit_mathnotes.pdf
which includes comparisons of 3dDeconvolve and 3dREMLfit
activations (individual subject and group maps), and an
outline of the mathematics implemented in this program.
----------------------------------------------------------
============================
== RWCox - July-Sept 2008 ==
============================
=========================================================================
* This binary version of 3dREMLfit is compiled using OpenMP, a semi-
automatic parallelizer software toolkit, which splits the work across
multiple CPUs/cores on the same shared memory computer.
* OpenMP is NOT like MPI -- it does not work with CPUs connected only
by a network (e.g., OpenMP doesn't work across cluster nodes).
* For some implementation and compilation details, please see
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/misc/OpenMP.html
* The number of CPU threads used will default to the maximum number on
your system. You can control this value by setting environment variable
OMP_NUM_THREADS to some smaller value (including 1).
* Un-setting OMP_NUM_THREADS resets OpenMP back to its default state of
using all CPUs available.
++ However, on some systems, it seems to be necessary to set variable
OMP_NUM_THREADS explicitly, or you only get one CPU.
++ On other systems with many CPUS, you probably want to limit the CPU
count, since using more than (say) 16 threads is probably useless.
* You must set OMP_NUM_THREADS in the shell BEFORE running the program,
since OpenMP queries this variable BEFORE the program actually starts.
++ You can't usefully set this variable in your ~/.afnirc file or on the
command line with the '-D' option.
* How many threads are useful? That varies with the program, and how well
it was coded. You'll have to experiment on your own systems!
* The number of CPUs on this particular computer system is ...... 2.
* The maximum number of CPUs that will be used is now set to .... 2.
* The REML matrix setup and REML voxel ARMA(1,1) estimation loops are
parallelized, across (a,b) parameter sets and across voxels, respectively.
* The GLSQ and OLSQ loops are not parallelized. They are usually much
faster than the REML voxel loop, and so I made no effort to speed
these up (now and forever, two and inseparable).
* '-usetemp' disables OpenMP multi-CPU usage, since the file I/O for
saving and restoring various matrices and results is not easily
parallelized. To get OpenMP speedup for large problems (just where
you want it), you'll need a lot of RAM.
=========================================================================
++ Compile date = May 20 2022 {AFNI_22.1.10:linux_ubuntu_16_64}
```