# 3dTfitter¶

```
Usage: 3dTfitter [options]
* At each voxel, assembles and solves a set of linear equations.
++ The matrix at each voxel may be the same or may be different.
++ This flexibility (for voxel-wise regressors) is one feature
that makes 3dTfitter different from 3dDeconvolve.
++ Another distinguishing feature is that 3dTfitter allows for
L2, L1, and L2+L1 (LASSO) regression solvers, and allows you
to impose sign constraints on the solution parameters.
* Output is a bucket dataset with the beta parameters at each voxel.
* You can also get output of fitted time series at each voxel, and
the error sum of squares (e.g., for generating statistics).
* You can also deconvolve with a known kernel function (e.g., an HRF
model in FMRI, or an arterial input function in DSC-MRI, et cetera),
in which case the output dataset is a new time series dataset,
containing the estimate of the source function that, when convolved
with your input kernel function, fits the data (in each voxel).
* The basic idea is to compute the beta_i so that the following
is approximately true:
RHS(t) = sum { beta_i * LHS_i(t) }
i>=1
With the '-FALTUNG' (deconvolution) option, the model expands to be
RHS(t) = sum { K(j)*S(t-j) } + sum { beta_i * LHS_i(t) }
j>=0 i>=1
where K() is the user-supplied causal kernel function, and S() is
the source time series to be estimated along with the betas
(which can be thought of as the 'baseline' fit).
* The model basis functions LHS_i(t) and the kernel function K(t)
can be .1D files (fixed for all voxels) and/or 3D+time datasets
(different for each voxel).
* The fitting approximation can be done in 4 different ways, minimizing
the errors (differences between RHS(t) and the fitted equation) in
the following ways:
++ L2 [-l2fit option] = least sum of squares of errors
++ L1 [-l1fit option] = least sum of absolute values of errors
++ L2 LASSO = least sum of squares of errors, with an added
[-l2lasso option] L1 penalty on the size of the solution parameters
++ L2 Square Root LASSO = least square root of the sum of squared errors
[-l2sqrtlasso option] with an added L1 penalty on the solution parameters
***** Which fitting method is better?
The answer to that question depends strongly on what you are
going to use the results for! And on the quality of the data.
*************************************************
***** 3dTfitter is not for the casual user! *****
***** It has a lot of options which let you *****
***** control the complex solution process. *****
*************************************************
----------------------------------
SPECIFYING THE EQUATIONS AND DATA:
----------------------------------
-RHS rset = Specifies the right-hand-side 3D+time dataset.
('rset' can also be a 1D file with 1 column)
* Exactly one '-RHS' option must be given to 3dTfitter.
-LHS lset = Specifies a column (or columns) of the left-hand-side matrix.
* More than one 'lset' can follow the '-LHS' option, but each
input filename must NOT start with the '-' character!
* Or you can use multiple '-LHS' options, if you prefer.
* Each 'lset' can be a 3D+time dataset, or a 1D file
with 1 or more columns.
* A 3D+time dataset defines one column in the LHS matrix.
++ If 'rset' is a 1D file, then you cannot input a 3D+time
dataset with '-LHS'.
++ If 'rset' is a 3D+time dataset, then the 3D+time dataset(s)
input with '-LHS' must have the same voxel grid as 'rset'.
* A 1D file defines as many columns in the LHS matrix as
are in the file.
++ For example, you could input the LHS matrix from the
.xmat.1D matrix file output by 3dDeconvolve, if you wanted
to repeat the same linear regression using 3dTfitter,
for some bizarre unfathomable twisted psychotic reason.
(See https://shorturl.at/boxU9 for more details.)
** If you have a problem where some LHS vectors might be tiny,
causing stability problems, you can choose to omit them
by using the '-vthr' option. By default, only all-zero
vectors will be omitted from the regression.
** Note that if the scales of the LHS vectors are grossly different
(e.g., 0 < vector#1 < 0.01 and 0 < vector#2 < 1000),
then numerical errors in the calculations might cause the
results to be unreliable. To avoid this problem, you can
scale the vectors (before running 3dTfitter) so that they
have similar magnitudes.
** Note that if you are fitting a time series dataset that has
nonzero mean, then at least some of your basis vectors
should have nonzero mean, or you won't be able to get a
good fit. If necessary, use '-polort 0' to fit the mean
value of the dataset, so that the zero-mean LHS vectors
can do their work in fitting the fluctuations in the data!
[This means you, HJJ!]
*** Columns are assembled in the order given on the command line,
which means that LHS parameters will be output in that order!
*** If all LHS inputs are 1D vectors AND you are using least
squares fitting without constraints, then 3dDeconvolve would
be more efficient, since each voxel would have the same set
of equations -- a fact that 3dDeconvolve exploits for speed.
++ But who cares about CPU time? Come on baby, light my fire!
-polort p = Add 'p+1' Legendre polynomial columns to the LHS matrix.
* These columns are added to the LHS matrix AFTER all other
columns specified by the '-LHS' option, even if the '-polort'
option appears before '-LHS' on the command line.
** By default, NO polynomial columns will be used.
-vthr v = The value 'v' (between 0.0 and 0.09, inclusive) defines the
threshold below which LHS vectors will be omitted from
the regression analysis. Each vector's L1 norm (sum of
absolute values) is computed. Any vector whose L1 norm
is less than or equal to 'v' times the largest L1 norm
will not be used in the analysis, and will get 0 weight
in the output. The purpose of this option is to let you
have tiny inputs and have them be ignored.
* By default, 'v' is zero ==> only exactly zero LHS columns
will be ignored in this case.
** Prior to 18 May 2010, the built-in (and fixed) value of
'v' was 0.000333. Thus, to get the old results, you should
use option '-vthr 0.000333' -- this means YOU, Rasmus Birn!
* Note that '-vthr' column censoring is done separately for
each voxel's regression problem, so if '-LHS' had any
dataset components (i.e., voxelwise regressors), a different
set of omitted columns could be used betwixt different voxels.
--------------
DECONVOLUTION:
--------------
-FALTUNG fset fpre pen fac
= Specifies a convolution (German: Faltung) model to be
added to the LHS matrix. Four arguments follow the option:
-->** 'fset' is a 3D+time dataset or a 1D file that specifies
the known kernel of the convolution.
* fset's time point [0] is the 0-lag point in the kernel,
[1] is the 1-lag into the past point, etc.
++ Call the data Z(t), the unknown signal S(t), and the
known kernel H(t). The equations being solved for
the set of all S(t) values are of the form
Z(t) = H(0)S(t) + H(1)S(t-1) + ... + H(L)S(t-L) + noise
where L is the last index in the kernel function.
++++ N.B.: The TR of 'fset' (the source of H) and the TR of the
RHS dataset (the source of Z) MUST be the same, or
the deconvolution results will be revoltingly
meaningless drivel (or worse)!
-->** 'fpre' is the prefix for the output time series S(t) to
be created -- it will have the same length as the input
'rset' time series.
++ If you don't want this time series (why?), set 'fpre'
to be the string 'NULL'.
++ If you want to see the fit of the model to the data
(a very good idea), use the '-fitts' option, which is
described later.
-->** 'pen' selects the type of penalty function to be
applied to constrain the deconvolved time series:
++ The following penalty functions are available:
P0[s] = f^q * sum{ |S(t)|^q }
P1[s] = f^q * sum{ |S(t)-S(t-1)|^q }
P2[s] = f^q * sum{ |2*S(t)-S(t-1)-S(t+1)|^q }
P3[s] = f^q * sum{ |3*S(t)-3*S(t-1)-S(t+1)+S(t-2)|^q }
where S(t) is the deconvolved time series;
where q=1 for L1 fitting, q=2 for L2 fitting;
where f is the value of 'fac' (defined below).
P0 tries to keep S(t) itself small
P1 tries to keep point-to-point fluctuations
in S(t) small (1st derivative)
P2 tries to keep 3 point fluctuations
in S(t) small (2nd derivative)
P3 tries to keep 4 point fluctuations
in S(t) small (3nd derivative)
++ Higher digits try to make the result function S(t)
smoother. If a smooth result makes sense, then use
the string '012' or '0123' for 'pen'.
++ In L2 regression, these penalties are analogous to Wiener
(frequency space) deconvolution, with noise spectra
proportional to
P0 ==> fac^2 * 1 (constant in frequency)
P1 ==> fac^2 * freq^2
P2 ==> fac^2 * freq^4
P3 ==> fac^2 * freq^6
However, 3dTfitter does deconvolution in the time
domain, not the frequency domain, and you can choose
to use L2, L1, or LASSO (L2+L1) regression.
++ The value of 'pen' is a combination of the digits
'0', '1', '2', and/or '3'; for example:
0 = use P0 only
1 = use P1 only
2 = use P2 only
3 = use P3 only
01 = use P0+P1 (the sum of these two functions)
02 = use P0+P2
12 = use P1+P2
012 = use P0+P1+P2 (sum of three penalty functions)
0123 = use P0+P1+P2+P3 (et cetera)
If 'pen' does not contain any of the digits 0..3,
then '01' will be used.
-->** 'fac' is the positive weight 'f' for the penalty function:
++ if fac < 0, then the program chooses a penalty factor
for each voxel separately and then scales that by -fac.
++ use fac = -1 to get this voxel-dependent factor unscaled.
(this is a very reasonable place to start, by the way :-)
++ fac = 0 is a special case: the program chooses a range
of penalty factors, does the deconvolution regression
for each one, and then chooses the fit it likes best
(as a tradeoff between fit error and solution size).
++ fac = 0 will be MUCH slower since it solves about 20
problems for each voxel and then chooses what it likes.
setenv AFNI_TFITTER_VERBOSE YES to get some progress
reports, if you want to see what it is doing.
++ Instead of using fac = 0, a useful alternative is to
do some test runs with several negative values of fac,
[e.g., -1, -2, and -3] and then look at the results to
determine which one is most suitable for your purposes.
++ It is a good idea to experiment with different fac values,
so you can see how the solution varies, and so you can get
some idea of what penalty level to use for YOUR problems.
++ SOME penalty has to be applied, since otherwise the
set of linear equations for S(t) is under-determined
and/or ill-conditioned!
** If '-LHS' is used with '-FALTUNG', those basis vectors can
be thought of as a baseline to be regressed out at the
same time the convolution model is fitted.
++ When '-LHS' supplies a baseline, it is important
that penalty type 'pen' include '0', so that the
collinearity between convolution with a constant S(t)
and a constant baseline can be resolved!
++ Instead of using a baseline here, you could project the
baseline out of a dataset or 1D file using 3dDetrend,
before using 3dTfitter.
*** At most one '-FALTUNG' option can be used!!!
*** Consider the time series model
Z(t) = K(t)*S(t) + baseline + noise,
where Z(t) = data time series (in each voxel)
K(t) = kernel (e.g., hemodynamic response function)
S(t) = stimulus time series
baseline = constant, drift, etc.
and * = convolution in time
Then program 3dDeconvolve solves for K(t) given S(t), whereas
3dTfitter -FALTUNG solves for S(t) given K(t). The difference
between the two cases is that K(t) is presumed to be causal and
have limited support, while S(t) is a full-length time series.
*** Presumably you know this already, but deconvolution in the
Fourier domain -1
S(t) = F { F[Z] / F[K] }
(where F[] is the Fourier transform) is a bad idea, since
division by small values F[K] will grotesquely amplify the
noise. 3dTfitter does NOT even try to do such a silly thing.
****** Deconvolution is a tricky business, so be careful out there!
++ e.g., Experiment with the different parameters to make
sure the results in your type of problems make sense.
-->>++ Look at the results and the fits with AFNI (or 1dplot)!
Do not blindly assume that the results are accurate.
++ Also, do not blindly assume that a paper promoting
a new deconvolution method that always works is
actually a good thing!
++ There is no guarantee that the automatic selection of
of the penalty factor herein will give usable results
for your problem!
++ You should probably use a mask dataset with -FALTUNG,
since deconvolution can often fail on pure noise
time series.
++ Unconstrained (no '-cons' options) least squares ('-lsqfit')
is normally the fastest solution method for deconvolution.
This, however, may only matter if you have a very long input
time series dataset (e.g., more than 1000 time points).
++ For unconstrained least squares deconvolution, a special
sparse matrix algorithm is used for speed. If you wish to
disable this for some reason, set environment variable
AFNI_FITTER_RCMAT to NO before running the program.
++ Nevertheless, a FALTUNG problem with more than 1000 time
points will probably take a LONG time to run, especially
if 'fac' is chosen to be 0.
----------------
SOLUTION METHOD:
----------------
-lsqfit = Solve equations via least squares [the default method].
* This is sometimes called L2 regression by mathematicians.
* '-l2fit' and '-L2' are synonyms for this option.
-l1fit = Solve equations via least sum of absolute residuals.
* This is sometimes called L1 regression by mathematicians.
* '-L1' is a synonym for this option.
* L1 fitting is usually slower than L2 fitting, but
is perhaps less sensitive to outliers in the data.
++ L1 deconvolution might give nicer looking results
when you expect the deconvolved signal S(t) to
have large-ish sections where S(t) = 0.
[The LASSO solution methods can also have this property.]
* L2 fitting is statistically more efficient when the
noise is KNOWN to be normally (Gaussian) distributed
(and a bunch of other assumptions are also made).
++ Where such KNOWLEDGE comes from is an interesting question.
-l2lasso lam [i j k ...]
= Solve equations via least squares with a LASSO (L1) penalty
on the coefficients.
* The positive value 'lam' after the option name is the
weight given to the penalty.
++ As a rule of thumb, you can try lam = 2 * sigma, where
sigma = standard deviation of noise, but that requires
you to have some idea what the noise level is.
++ If you enter 'lam' as a negative number, then the code
will CRUDELY estimate sigma and then scale abs(lam) by
that value -- in which case, you can try lam = -2 (or so)
and see if that works well for you.
++ Or you can use the Square Root LASSO option (next), which
(in theory) does not need to know sigma when setting lam.
++ If you do not provide lam, or give a value of 0, then a
default value will be used.
* Optionally, you can supply a list of parameter indexes
(after 'lam') that should NOT be penalized in the
the fitting process (e.g., traditionally, the mean value
is not included in the L1 penalty.) Indexes start at 1,
as in 'consign' (below).
++ If this un-penalized integer list has long stretches of
contiguous entries, you can specify ranges of integers,
as in '1:9' instead of '1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9'.
**-->>++ If you want to supply the list of indexes that GET a
L1 penalty, instead of the list that does NOT, you can
put an 'X' character first, as in
-LASSO 0 X 12:41
to indicate that variables 12..41 (inclusive) get the
penalty applied, and the other variables do not. This
inversion might be more useful to you in some cases.
++ If you also want the indexes to have 1 added to them and
be inverted -- because they came from a 0-based program --
then use 'X1', as in '-LASSO 0 X1 12:41'.
++ If you want the indexes to have 1 added to them but NOT
to be inverted, use 'Y1', as in '-LASSO 0 Y1 13:42'.
++ Note that if you supply an integer list, you MUST supply
a value for lam first, even if that value is 0.
++ In deconvolution ('-FALTUNG'), all baseline parameters
(from '-LHS' and/or '-polort') are automatically non-penalized,
so there is usually no point to using this un-penalizing feature.
++ If you are NOT doing deconvolution, then you'll need this
option to un-penalize any '-polort' parameters (if desired).
** LASSO-ing herein should be considered experimental, and its
implementation is subject to change! You should definitely
play with different 'lam' values to see how well they work
for your particular types of problems. Algorithm is here:
++ TT Wu and K Lange.
Coordinate descent algorithms for LASSO penalized regression.
Annals of Applied Statistics, 2: 224-244 (2008).
http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3876
* '-LASSO' is a synonym for this option.
-lasso_centro_block i j k ...
= Defines a block of coefficients that will be penalized together
with ABS( beta[i] - centromean( beta[i], beta[j] , ... ) )
where the centromean(a,b,...) is computed by sorting the
arguments (a,b,...) and then averaging the central 50% values.
* The goal is to use LASSO to shrink these coefficients towards
a common value to suppress outliers, rather than the default
LASSO method of shrinking coefficients towards 0, where the
penalty on coefficient beta[i] is just ABS( beta[i] ).
* For example:
-lasso_centro_block 12:26 -lasso_centro_block 27:41
These options define two blocks of coefficients.
-->>*** The intended application of this option is to regularize
(reduce fluctuations) in the 'IM' regression method from
3dDeconvolve, where each task instance gets a separate
beta fit parameter.
*** That is, the idea is that you run 3dTfitter to get the
'IM' betas as an alternative to 3dDeconvolve or 3dREMLfit,
since the centromean regularization will damp down wild
fluctuations in the individual task betas.
*** In this example, the two blocks of coefficients correspond
to the beta values for each of two separate tasks.
*** The input '-LHS' matrix is available from 3dDeconvolve's
'-x1D' option.
*** Further details on 'blocks' can be found in this Google Doc
https://shorturl.at/boxU9
including shell commands on how to extract the block indexes
from the header of the matrix file.
*** A 'lam' value for the '-LASSO' option that makes sense is a value
between -1 and -2, but as usual, you'll have to experiment with
your particular data and application.
* If you have more than one block, do NOT let them overlap,
because the program doesn't check for this kind of stoopidity
and then peculiar/bad things will probably happen!
* A block defined here must have at least 5 entries.
In practice, I would recommend at least 12 entries for a
block, or the whole idea of 'shrinking to the centromean'
is silly.
* This option can be abbreviated as '-LCB', since typing
'-lasso_centro_block' correctly is a nontrivial challenge :-)
*** This option is NOT implemented for -l2sqrtlasso :-(
* [New option - 10 Aug 2021 - RWCox]
-l2sqrtlasso lam [i j k ...]
= Similar to above option, but uses 'Square Root LASSO' instead:
* Approximately speaking, LASSO minimizes E = Q2+lam*L1,
where Q2=sum of squares of residuals and L1=sum of absolute
values of all fit parameters, while Square Root LASSO minimizes
sqrt(Q2)+lam*L1; the method and motivation is described here:
++ A Belloni, V Chernozhukov, and L Wang.
Square-root LASSO: Pivotal recovery of sparse signals via
conic programming (2010). http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5689
++ A coordinate descent algorithm is also used for this optimization
(unlike in the paper above).
** A reasonable range of 'lam' to use is from 1 to 10 (or so);
I suggest you start with 2 and see how well that works.
++ Unlike the pure LASSO option above, you do not need to give
give a negative value for lam here -- there is no need for
scaling by sigma -- or so they say.
* The theoretical advantange of Square Root LASSO over
standard LASSO is that a good choice of 'lam' does not
depend on knowing the noise level in the data (that is
what 'Pivotal' means in the paper's title).
* '-SQRTLASSO' is a synonym for this option.
--------->>**** GENERAL NOTES ABOUT LASSO and SQUARE ROOT LASSO ****<<--------
* LASSO methods are the only way to solve a under-determined
system with 3dTfitter -- one with more vectors on the RHS
than time points. However, a 'solution' to such a problem
doesn't necessarily mean anything -- be careful out there!
* LASSO methods will tend to push small coefficients down
to zero. This feature can be useful when doing deconvolution,
if you expect the result to be zero over large-ish intervals.
++ L1 regression ('-l1fit') has a similar property, of course.
++ This difficult-to-estimate bias in the LASSO-computed coefficients
makes it nearly impossible to provide reliable estimates of statistical
significance for the fit (e.g., R^2, F, ...).
* The actual penalty factor lambda used for a given coefficient
is lam scaled by the L2 norm of the corresponding regression
column. The purpose of this is to keep the penalties scale-free:
if a regression column were doubled, then the corresponding fit
coefficient would be cut in half; thus, to keep the same penalty
level, lambda should also be doubled.
* For '-l2lasso', a negative lam additionally means to scale
by the estimate of sigma, as described earlier. This feature
does not apply to Square Root LASSO, however (if you give a
negative lam to '-l2sqrtlasso', its absolute value is used).
-->>** There is no 'best' value of lam; if you are lucky, there is
is a range of lam values that give reasonable results. A good
procedure to follow would be to use several different values of
lam and see how the results vary; for example, the list
lam = -1, -2, -4, -7, -10 might be a good starting point.
* If you don't give ANY numeric value after the LASSO option
(i.e., the next argument on the command line is another option),
then the program will use '-3.1415926536' for the value of lam.
* A tiny value of lam (say 0.01) should give almost the same
results as pure L2 regression.
* Data with a smaller signal-to-noise ratio will probably need
larger values of lam -- you'll have to experiment.
* The number of iterations used for the LASSO solution will be
printed out for the first voxel solved, and for ever 10,000th
one following -- this is mostly for my personal edification.
-->>** Recall: "3dTfitter is not for the casual user!"
This statement especially applies when using LASSO, which is a
powerful tool -- and as such, can be dangerous if not used wisely.
---------------------
SOLUTION CONSTRAINTS:
---------------------
-consign = Follow this option with a list of LHS parameter indexes
to indicate that the sign of some output LHS parameters
should be constrained in the solution; for example:
-consign +1 -3
which indicates that LHS parameter #1 (from the first -LHS)
must be non-negative, and that parameter #3 must be
non-positive. Parameter #2 is unconstrained (e.g., the
output can be positive or negative).
* Parameter counting starts with 1, and corresponds to
the order in which the LHS columns are specified.
* Unlike '-LHS or '-label', only one '-consign' option
can be used.
* Do NOT give the same index more than once after
'-consign' -- you can't specify that an coefficient
is both non-negative and non-positive, for example!
*** Constraints can be used with any of the 4 fitting methods.
*** '-consign' constraints only apply to the '-LHS'
fit parameters. To constrain the '-FALTUNG' output,
use the option below.
* If '-consign' is not used, the signs of the fitted
LHS parameters are not constrained.
-consFAL c= Constrain the deconvolution time series from '-FALTUNG'
to be positive if 'c' is '+' or to be negative if
'c' is '-'.
* There is no way at present to constrain the deconvolved
time series S(t) to be positive in some regions and
negative in others.
* If '-consFAL' is not used, the sign of the deconvolved
time series is not constrained.
---------------
OUTPUT OPTIONS:
---------------
-prefix p = Prefix for the output dataset (LHS parameters) filename.
* Output datasets from 3dTfitter are always in float format.
* If you don't give this option, 'Tfitter' is the prefix.
* If you don't want this dataset, use 'NULL' as the prefix.
* If you are doing deconvolution and do not also give any
'-LHS' options, then this file will not be output, since
it comprises the fit parameters for the '-LHS' vectors.
-->>** If the input '-RHS' file is a .1D file, normally the
output files are written in the AFNI .3D ASCII format,
where each row contains the time series data for one
voxel. If you want to have these files written in the
.1D format, with time represented down the column
direction, be sure to put '.1D' on the end of the prefix,
as in '-prefix Elvis.1D'. If you use '-' or 'stdout' as
the prefix, the resulting 1D file will be written to the
terminal. (See the fun fun fun examples, below.)
-label lb = Specifies sub-brick labels in the output LHS parameter dataset.
* More than one 'lb' can follow the '-label' option;
however, each label must NOT start with the '-' character!
* Labels are applied in the order given.
* Normally, you would provide exactly as many labels as
LHS columns. If not, the program invents some labels.
-fitts ff = Prefix filename for the output fitted time series dataset.
* Which is always in float format.
* Which will not be written if this option isn't given!
*** If you want the residuals, subtract this time series
from the '-RHS' input using 3dcalc (or 1deval).
-errsum e = Prefix filename for the error sums dataset, which
is calculated from the difference between the input
time series and the fitted time series (in each voxel):
* Sub-brick #0 is the sum of squares of differences (L2 sum)
* Sub-brick #1 is the sum of absolute differences (L1 sum)
* The L2 sum value, in particular, can be used to produce
a statistic to measure the significance of a fit model;
cf. the 'Correlation Coefficient Example' far below.
--------------
OTHER OPTIONS:
--------------
-mask ms = Read in dataset 'ms' as a mask; only voxels with nonzero
values in the mask will be processed. Voxels falling
outside the mask will be set to all zeros in the output.
* Voxels whose time series are all zeros will not be
processed, even if they are inside the mask!
-quiet = Don't print the fun fun fun progress report messages.
* Why would you want to hide these delightful missives?
----------------------
ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES:
----------------------
AFNI_TFITTER_VERBOSE = YES means to print out information during
the fitting calculations.
++ Automatically turned on for 1 voxel -RHS inputs.
AFNI_TFITTER_P1SCALE = number > 0 will scale the P1 penalty by
this value (e.g., to count it more)
AFNI_TFITTER_P2SCALE = number > 0 will scale the P2 penalty by
this value
AFNI_TFITTER_P3SCALE = number > 0 will scale the P3 penalty by
this value
You could set these values on the command line using the AFNI standard
'-Dvariablename=value' command line option.
------------
NON-Options:
------------
* There is no option to produce statistical estimates of the
significance of the parameter estimates.
++ 3dTcorrelate might be useful, to compute the correlation
between the '-fitts' time series and the '-RHS' input data.
++ You can use the '-errsum' option to get around this limitation,
with enough cleverness.
* There are no options for censoring or baseline generation (except '-polort').
++ You could generate some baseline 1D files using 1deval, perhaps.
* There is no option to constrain the range of the output parameters,
except the semi-infinite ranges provided by '-consign' and/or '-consFAL'.
* This program is NOW parallelized via OpenMP :-) [17 Aug 2021 - RWCox]
------------------
Contrived Example:
------------------
The datasets 'atm' and 'btm' are assumed to have 99 time points each.
We use 3dcalc to create a synthetic combination of these plus a constant
plus Gaussian noise, then use 3dTfitter to fit the weights of these
3 functions to each voxel, using 4 different methods. Note the use of
the input 1D time series '1D: 99@1' to provide the constant term.
3dcalc -a atm+orig -b btm+orig -expr '-2*a+b+gran(100,20)' -prefix 21 -float
3dTfitter -RHS 21+orig -LHS atm+orig btm+orig '1D: 99@1' -prefix F2u -l2fit
3dTfitter -RHS 21+orig -LHS atm+orig btm+orig '1D: 99@1' -prefix F1u -l1fit
3dTfitter -RHS 21+orig -LHS atm+orig btm+orig '1D: 99@1' -prefix F1c -l1fit \
-consign -1 +3
3dTfitter -RHS 21+orig -LHS atm+orig btm+orig '1D: 99@1' -prefix F2c -l2fit \
-consign -1 +3
In the absence of noise and error, the output datasets should be
#0 sub-brick = -2.0 in all voxels
#1 sub-brick = +1.0 in all voxels
#2 sub-brick = +100.0 in all voxels
----------------------
Yet More Contrivances:
----------------------
You can input a 1D file for the RHS dataset, as in the example below,
to fit a single time series to a weighted sum of other time series:
1deval -num 30 -expr 'cos(t)' > Fcos.1D
1deval -num 30 -expr 'sin(t)' > Fsin.1D
1deval -num 30 -expr 'cos(t)*exp(-t/20)' > Fexp.1D
3dTfitter -quiet -RHS Fexp.1D -LHS Fcos.1D Fsin.1D -prefix -
* Note the use of the '-' as a prefix to write the results
(just 2 numbers) to stdout, and the use of '-quiet' to hide
the divertingly funny and informative progress messages.
* For the Jedi AFNI Masters out there, the above example can be carried
out on using single complicated command line:
3dTfitter -quiet -RHS `1deval -1D: -num 30 -expr 'cos(t)*exp(-t/20)'` \
-LHS `1deval -1D: -num 30 -expr 'cos(t)'` \
`1deval -1D: -num 30 -expr 'sin(t)'` \
-prefix -
resulting in the single output line below:
0.535479 0.000236338
which are respectively the fit coefficients of 'cos(t)' and 'sin(t)'.
--------------------------------
Contrived Deconvolution Example:
--------------------------------
(1) Create a 101 point 1D file that is a block of 'activation'
between points 40..50, convolved with a triangle wave kernel
(the '-iresp' input below):
3dConvolve -input1D -polort -1 -num_stimts 1 \
-stim_file 1 '1D: 40@0 10@1 950@0' \
-stim_minlag 1 0 -stim_maxlag 1 5 \
-iresp 1 '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' -nlast 100 \
| grep -v Result | grep -v '^$' > F101.1D
(2) Create a 3D+time dataset with this time series in each
voxel, plus noise that increases with voxel 'i' index:
3dUndump -prefix Fjunk -dimen 100 100 1
3dcalc -a Fjunk+orig -b F101.1D \
-expr 'b+gran(0,0.04*(i+1))' \
-float -prefix F101d
/bin/rm -f Fjunk+orig.*
(3) Deconvolve, then look what you get by running AFNI:
3dTfitter -RHS F101d+orig -l1fit \
-FALTUNG '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' F101d_fal1 012 0.0
3dTfitter -RHS F101d+orig -l2fit \
-FALTUNG '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' F101d_fal2 012 0.0
(4) View F101d_fal1+orig, F101d_fal2+orig, and F101d+orig in AFNI,
(in Axial image and graph viewers) and see how the fit quality
varies with the noise level and the regression type -- L1 or
L2 regression. Note that the default 'fac' level of 0.0 was
selected in the commands above, which means the program selects
the penalty factor for each voxel, based on the size of the
data time series fluctuations and the quality of the fit.
(5) Add logistic noise (long tails) to the noise-free 1D time series, then
deconvolve and plot the results directly to the screen, using L1 and L2
and the two LASSO fitting methods:
1deval -a F101.1D -expr 'a+lran(.5)' > F101n.1D
3dTfitter -RHS F101n.1D -l1fit \
-FALTUNG '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' stdout 01 -2 | 1dplot -stdin -THICK &
3dTfitter -RHS F101n.1D -l2fit \
-FALTUNG '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' stdout 01 -2 | 1dplot -stdin -THICK &
3dTfitter -RHS F101n.1D -l2sqrtlasso 2 \
-FALTUNG '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' stdout 01 -2 | 1dplot -stdin -THICK &
3dTfitter -RHS F101n.1D -l2lasso -2 \
-FALTUNG '1D: 0 1 2 3 2 1' stdout 01 -2 | 1dplot -stdin -THICK &
For even more fun, add the '-consfal +' option to the above commands,
to force the deconvolution results to be positive.
***N.B.: You can only use 'stdout' as an output filename when
the output will be written as a 1D file (as above)!
--------------------------------
Correlation Coefficient Example:
--------------------------------
Suppose your initials are HJJ and you want to compute the partial
correlation coefficient of time series Seed.1D with every voxel in
a dataset Rest+orig once a spatially dependent 'artifact' time series
Art+orig has been projected out. You can do this with TWO 3dTfitter
runs, plus 3dcalc:
(1) Run 3dTfitter with ONLY the artifact time series and get the
error sum dataset
3dTfitter -RHS Rest+orig -LHS Art+orig -polort 2 -errsum Ebase
(2) Run 3dTfitter again with the artifact PLUS the seed time series
and get the error sum dataset and also the beta coefficients
3dTfitter -RHS Rest+orig -LHS Seed.1D Art+orig -polort 2 \
-errsum Eseed -prefix Bseed
(3) Compute the correlation coefficient from the amount of variance
reduction between cases 1 and 2, times the sign of the beta
3dcalc -a Eseed+orig'[0]' -b Ebase+orig'[0]' -c Bseed+orig'[0]' \
-prefix CorrSeed -expr '(2*step(c)-1)*sqrt(1-a/b)'
3drefit -fbuc -sublabel 0 'SeedCorrelation' CorrSeed+orig
More cleverness could be used to compute t- or F-statistics in a
similar fashion, using the error sum of squares between 2 different fits.
(Of course, these are assuming you use the default '-lsqfit' method.)
--------------------------------
PPI (psycho-physiological interaction) Example:
--------------------------------
Suppose you are running a PPI analysis and want to deconvolve a GAM
signal from the seed time series, hoping (very optimistically) to
convert from the BOLD time series (typical FMRI signal) to a
neurological time series (an impulse signal, say).
If the BOLD signal at the seed is seed_BOLD.1D and the GAM signal is
GAM.1D, then consider this example for the deconvolution, in order to
create the neuro signal, seed_neuro.1D:
3dTfitter -RHS seed_BOLD.1D \
-FALTUNG GAM.1D seed_neuro.1D 012 -2 \
-l2lasso -6
*************************************************************************
** RWCox - Feb 2008, et seq. **
** Created for the glorious purposes of John A Butman, MD, PhD, Poobah **
** But might be useful for some other well-meaning souls out there **
*************************************************************************
=========================================================================
* This binary version of 3dTfitter is compiled using OpenMP, a semi-
automatic parallelizer software toolkit, which splits the work across
multiple CPUs/cores on the same shared memory computer.
* OpenMP is NOT like MPI -- it does not work with CPUs connected only
by a network (e.g., OpenMP doesn't work across cluster nodes).
* For some implementation and compilation details, please see
https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/misc/OpenMP.html
* The number of CPU threads used will default to the maximum number on
your system. You can control this value by setting environment variable
OMP_NUM_THREADS to some smaller value (including 1).
* Un-setting OMP_NUM_THREADS resets OpenMP back to its default state of
using all CPUs available.
++ However, on some systems, it seems to be necessary to set variable
OMP_NUM_THREADS explicitly, or you only get one CPU.
++ On other systems with many CPUS, you probably want to limit the CPU
count, since using more than (say) 16 threads is probably useless.
* You must set OMP_NUM_THREADS in the shell BEFORE running the program,
since OpenMP queries this variable BEFORE the program actually starts.
++ You can't usefully set this variable in your ~/.afnirc file or on the
command line with the '-D' option.
* How many threads are useful? That varies with the program, and how well
it was coded. You'll have to experiment on your own systems!
* The number of CPUs on this particular computer system is ...... 1.
* The maximum number of CPUs that will be used is now set to .... 1.
=========================================================================
++ Compile date = Oct 31 2024 {AFNI_24.3.06:linux_ubuntu_24_64}
```